North Carolina considers outlawing accurate predictions of sea level rise [IO9, with link to Scientific American]
Source found for missing water in sea level rise [Nature]
When things get tough, lawmakers get creative. Faced with predictions that sea levels in the coastal areas of North Carolina will rise by a meter in the next century, legislators are considering bold action: making those predictions illegal. A bill being circulated in the Tarheel state would force scientists to estimate future sea levels on a linear path based on trends since 1900 — in other words, based on the simple assumption that trends always move in a straight line, no matter what.The end of fish in one chart [Washington Post]
Source found for missing water in sea level rise [Nature]
During the latter half of the twentieth century, global sea level rose by about 1.8 millimetres per year, according to data from tide gauges. The combined contribution from heating of the oceans, which makes the water expand, along with melting of ice caps and glaciers, is estimated to be 1.1 millimetres per year, which leaves some 0.7 millimetres per year unaccounted for. This gap has been considered an important missing piece of the puzzle in estimates for past and current sea-level changes and for projections of future rises.Krugman: This may be when it all falls apart [Raw Story, with videos embedded from "Conversations with Great Minds"]
It now seems that the effects of human water use on land could fill that gap. A team of researchers reports in Nature Geoscience that land-based water storage could account for 0.77 millimetres per year, or 42%, of the observed sea-level rise between 1961 and 2003. Of that amount, the extraction of groundwater for irrigation and home and industrial use, with subsequent run-off to rivers and eventually to the oceans, represents the bulk of the contribution.
Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman said Monday that the tepid response to the current economic crisis could ruin the United States and Europe.Congress should ban armed drones before cops in Texas deploy one [The Atlantic]
“We are living through a time where we face an enormous economic challenge,” he told RT’s Thom Hartmann. “We are facing — obviously — the worst challenge in 80 years and we are totally mucking up the response. We’re doing a terrible job. We’re failing to deal with it. All of the people, the respectable people, the serious people, have made a total hash of this. That is a recipe for radicalism. It is a recipe for breakdown.”
Krugman noted that the massive demonstrations in parts of Europe were reminiscent of the 1930s.
“There are a lot of ugly forces being unleashed in our societies on both sides of the Atlantic because our economic policy has been such a dismal failure, because we are refusing to listen to the lessons of history. We may look back at this thirty years from now and say, ‘That is when it all fell apart.’ And by all, I don’t just mean the economy.”
Chief Deputy McDaniel has been quoted telling the press that tear gas and rubber bullets might be added to the unmanned aerial vehicle. CBS News quotes him explaining that "those are things that law enforcement utilizes day in and day out and in certain situations it might be advantageous to have this type of system."I can't find a good article on this incident, so let me explain what's going on. The Montgomery, Texas sheriff's department bought a drone/UAV that is capable of having various weapons systems mounted on it. They intend to arm it with a weapon for firing rubber bullets and also tear gas, which means it will also be able to fire lead bullets and grenades since the device for firing one can be loaded with either.
1 comment | Leave a comment